|
On
this subject, they specified that:
|
-
|
hygiene
must not be safeguarded to the detrimend of the enviroment and
that the solution to the problem ust be found without causing
any autonomous dispersion of the elements of parts of cans or
any of their additional element; |
|
-
|
the
solution must be real. Do not be an appearance operation that
could show most dangerous than the actual trouble (for example:
The protection coverings put on the lid, to be efficacious,
may be collocated in a vacuum and sealed on the tin body. In
fact it's hygiene expert opinion that moulds going to form in
the micro-hothouse that there is between the tin lid and the
protection covering get worst the actual already dangerous hygienic
state); |
The S.H.E.S. Opening System solution avoid the separate parts from
being dispersed in the environment.
Having the dispenser built with the same material of the body and/or
the lid allow for a full recycle, with a small cost (the energy cost
of recycling aluminium is about 5% respect to the primary aluminium)
, of the can. Its adoption, who results in a slight increase of overall
costs, is so with total absence of any environmental impact and at
the same time provides substantial advantages in terms of hygiene,
safety and convenience.
The hygienic safety, the convenience and the total recycling together
with the fact that the tins in no way may be, accidental or intentional
(a third of firms expect the tampering risk) broken, will gain the
trust of consumers to the tins and would confirm aluminium's record
in beverage containers, today threatened by PET.
|